Do We Need Basic Research in Cardiac Surgery?

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Published: January 2018


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Thinking about the daily practice of cardiac surgery, genetically altered mouse models, polymerase chain reactions, western blots, and other laboratory tools are the last that comes to mind. It is, therefore, not surprising that the pursuit of such basic science activities by practicing surgeons and those in training is often limited. However, there is an innate connection between these two seemingly different disciplines. To address and visualize this connection, we propose the following three hypotheses. First, cardiac surgery would not be at its present level of expertise without fundamental contributions of basic science. Second, without practicing cardiac surgeons performing basic research and translating their results to clinical practice next to their daily work, our ability to care for cardiac surgery patients would be poorer. Third, basic science training for those aiming to become practicing cardiac surgeons improves their ability to properly care for their patients. Finally, we will discuss some potentially even unexpected implications for our currently changing daily clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1571305DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac surgery
12
basic science
12
practicing cardiac
8
cardiac surgeons
8
clinical practice
8
basic
5
cardiac
5
basic cardiac
4
cardiac surgery?
4
surgery? thinking
4

Similar Publications

Germline Findings From Tumor-Only Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in the RATIONAL Study: A Missed Opportunity?

JCO Precis Oncol

September 2025

Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.

Purpose: Tumor comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) may detect potential germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) alterations as secondary findings. We analyzed the frequency of potentially germline variants and large rearrangements (LRs) in the RATIONAL study, an Italian multicenter, observational clinical trial that collects next-generation sequencing-based tumor profiling data, and evaluated how these findings were managed by the enrolling centers.

Patients And Methods: Patients prospectively enrolled in the pathway-B of the RATIONAL study and undergoing CGP with the FoundationOne CDx assays were included in the analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The no-touch (NT) technique for saphenous vein (SV) harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery preserves perivascular tissue and has been proposed to improve vein graft patency compared to conventional (CON) harvesting. However, recent large randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis of all available RCTs comparing graft patency and clinical outcomes between NT-SV and CON-SV harvesting techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report the first use of the EnSite X system for intraoperative electrophysiological mapping during a robotic hybrid ablation (ROK-AF procedure) for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Epicardial ablation targets were identified, and post-ablation electrical silencing was validated. Unlike conventional systems, its orientation-independent omnipolar technology provides directional activation vectors, high-resolution electrograms, and peak frequency analysis, thereby enhancing substrate characterisation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Poor Olfaction and Risk of Heart Failure in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci

September 2025

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Background: Poor olfaction may be associated with incident heart failure (HF) in older adults, but empirical evidence is scant.

Methods: We included 5,217 participants free of clinical HF and with a smell assessment in 2011-2013 from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Olfaction was measured by the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test and defined as good (score 11-12), moderate (9-10), or poor (≤8).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF