98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To explore variation in public hospital rates of early (37-38 weeks gestation) prelabour repeat caesarean section among low-risk women at and beyond term in New South Wales (NSW) between 2008 and 2011. IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY: A NSW Ministry of Health policy directive for public hospitals (PD2007_024), 'Maternity - timing of elective or pre-labour caesarean section', requires that low-risk elective or prelabour caesarean section does not occur before 39 completed weeks gestation. However, compliance with this policy has not been evaluated.
Study Type: Population-based record linkage study Methods: Linked birth and hospital data for low-risk, prelabour repeat caesarean sections in NSW in 2008-2011 were analysed using multilevel regression modelling. Rates were adjusted for casemix and hospital factors. Low-risk pregnancies were defined as singleton live births at 37-42 weeks gestation among women without medical or obstetric complications and where the indication for caesarean section was 'elective repeat caesarean section'.
Results: In 2008-2011, there were 15 163 prelabour repeat caesarean sections among low-risk women in NSW. Overall, 34.7% of low-risk prelabour repeat caesarean sections occurred before 39 weeks gestation. Adjusted NSW public hospital rates of early (37-38 weeks gestation) low-risk prelabour repeat caesarean section varied widely (16.3-67.5%). Adjusting for casemix factors actually increased the between-hospital variation by 4.3%; adjusting for hospital factors reduced variation by 20.0%. Smoking, private healthcare, assisted reproductive technology use, higher parity, a noncaesarean uterine scar and delivering in a hospital with CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) facilities were associated with higher odds of early delivery, although infants that were small for gestational age were associated with lower odds. Hospitals with higher rates of low-risk deliveries and higher propensity for vaginal birth after caesarean section had lower odds of early delivery.
Conclusions: The findings suggest generally poor compliance with the policy directive that prelabour caesarean does not occur before 39 weeks gestation, with adjusted compliance rates ranging from 32.5% to 83.7%. Large between-hospital variation after adjustment suggests that nonmedical factors are related to timing of low-risk prelabour repeat caesarean sections. Further strategies are needed to improve adherence to this evidence based policy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.17061/phrp2611608 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health, Denver, USA.
Background And Objectives: While urinary catheters are widely utilized during cesarean delivery, little evidence exists to support the practice, and it may be associated with increased risk of urinary tract infections and unnecessary intervention. In this study we aim to describe postoperative voiding patterns and assess the prevalence of complications in patients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery without an indwelling intraoperative urinary catheter. Materials and methods: This is a prospective observational cohort of patients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery at an urban safety-net teaching institution from April 2022 to April 2023.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol
July 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Optimal neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery requires a thorough understanding of patient, obstetrical, surgical, and anesthesia-related factors which can impact pain during and after cesarean delivery. While not all cesarean deliveries are the same from an obstetrical standpoint, not all anesthetics provide the same degree of anesthetic blockade and postcesarean analgesia; therefore, context is crucial to provide patients with a safe and pain-free experience. Communication between obstetrical and anesthesia teams is key to ensure that the anesthetic approach is tailored to the clinical scenario, particularly if emergency cesarean delivery is needed, and follows best practices for cesarean delivery anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Public Health
August 2025
Department of Physical Activity and Health, Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior (ESDRM), Polytechnic University of Santarém, Rio Maior, Portugal.
Background: Cesarean section (CS) is a common surgical procedure in obstetrics, and its prevalence has been increasing globally. While the immediate outcomes of CS are well-documented, its long-term effects, particularly on maternal health, remain an area of active research. One of the critical concerns is the impact of a previous CS on gestational body mass gain (GBMG), physical activity (PA) and the likelihood of undergoing another CS in subsequent pregnancies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pregnancy Childbirth
August 2025
²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Background: This prospective clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of single-layer versus double-layer uterine closure techniques on cesarean scar healing in women undergoing repeat cesarean delivery.
Methods: Seventy women aged 18-50 years with a history of at least one prior cesarean delivery were randomized into two groups: single-layer non-locking closure (n = 35) and double-layer non-locking closure with surgical refreshing of the incision edges (n = 35). The primary outcome was residual myometrial thickness (RMT) measured by transvaginal ultrasonography at six months.
PLoS One
August 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Introduction: Worldwide, numbers of repeat cesarean sections continue to rise. Although there is a multitude of evidence about the safety of a vaginal delivery attempt after one cesarean section, data is scarce regarding the risks of one compared to two prior procedures. This study aims to determine whether vaginal childbirth is less safe and successful for both mother and child in patients with a history of two cesarean sections compared to those with only one.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF