Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To present characterization, process flow, and applications of 3D fabricated low density phantoms for radiotherapy quality assurance (QA).
Material And Methods: A Rostock 3D printer using polystyrene was employed to print slabs of varying relative electron densities (0.18-0.75). A CT scan was used to calibrate infill-to-density and characterize uniformity of the print. Two printed low relative density rods (0.18, 0.52) were benchmarked against a commercial CT-electron-density phantom. Density scaling of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) was tested with EBT3 film for a 0.57 slab. Gamma criterion of 3% and 3 mm was used for analysis.
Results: 3D printed slabs demonstrated uniformity for densities 0.4-0.75. The printed 0.52 rod had close agreement with the commercial phantom. Dosimetric comparison for 0.57 density slab showed >95% agreement between calculation and measurements.
Conclusion: 3D printing allows fabrication of variable density phantoms for QA needs of a small clinic.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.013 | DOI Listing |