A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in endometrial cancer. | LitMetric

Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Gynecol Oncol

Gynecologic Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: July 2015


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the risk of metastasis in the remaining non-SLNs when the SLN is positive and to identify the factors that can predict this risk.

Methods: We reviewed all patients who underwent primary surgery for endometrial carcinoma with lymphadenectomy and SLN mapping (November 2010-November 2013) in our center. SLNs were ultra-staged on final pathology.

Results: A total of 268 patients were included. Overall, 43/268 patients (16%) were found to have SLN metastasis: macro-metastasis in 24 patients, micro-metastasis in 7 and ITC in 12. Non-SLN metastases were found in 15 of the 43 patients (34.8%) with positive SLN. Size of the SLN metastasis was the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of non-SLN metastasis (p=0.005). When the size of the SLN metastasis was ≤2mm, the risk of having another positive lymph node was only 5%, conversely, when the size of the SLN metastasis was >2mm, the risk of having another positive lymph node was 60.8% (p<0.0001). Histologic type, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, cervical stromal invasion and CA-125 were not predictive.

Conclusion: When the SLN is positive, the risk of metastasis in the remaining non-SLNs was 34.8%. Size of the metastasis within the SLN was the only factor that could predict the risk of non-SLN metastasis; 2mm seems to be the cutoff size below which the risk of non-SLN metastasis is low.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sln metastasis
20
lymph node
16
size sln
12
metastasis
8
non-sln metastasis
8
sln
8
risk positive
8
positive lymph
8
patients
6
predictors non-sentinel
4

Similar Publications