98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Herein, we firstly present the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) as performed in Asia and evaluate whether it could overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy.
Materials And Methods: From October 2013 to November 2013, RSSC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease was firstly performed consecutively in five patients. We evaluated these early experiences of RSSC and compared factors including clinicopathologic factors and operative outcomes with our initial cases of single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC).
Results: Four female patients and one male patient underwent RSSC. Neither open conversion nor bile duct injury or bile spillage was noted during surgery. In comparisons with SFLC, patient-related factors in terms of age, sex, Body Mass Index, diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiologist score showed no significant differences between two groups. There were no significant differences in the operative outcomes regarding intraoperative blood loss, bile spillage during operation, postoperative pain scale values, postoperative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups (p<0.05). Actual dissection time (p=0.003) and total operation time (p=0.001) were significantly longer in RSSC than in SFLC. There were no drain insertion or open conversion cases in either group.
Conclusion: RSSC provides a comfortable environment and improved ergonomics to laparoscopic single-site cholecystectomy; however, this technique needs to be modified to allow for more effective intracorporeal movement. As experience and technical innovations continue, RSSC will soon be alternative procedure for well-selected benign GB disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276755 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.189 | DOI Listing |
Nat Rev Urol
September 2025
Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
The advent of the purpose-built da Vinci single-port robotic platform marks a pivotal advancement in minimally invasive urological surgery. Designed to overcome the ergonomic and technical limitations of prior single-site approaches, the single-port system enables complex procedures through a single incision, with enhanced dexterity, optimized use of confined spaces and improved cosmetic and peri-operative outcomes. The single-port system has been increasingly used across a wide range of urological indications, including robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy and reconstructive surgeries such as pyeloplasty and ureteral re-implantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
August 2025
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southeast Health Medical Center, Dothan, USA.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34702.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Robot Surg
August 2025
Centre for Integrative Omics Data Science, Yenepoya (Deemed to Be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, 575018, India.
Curr Opin Oncol
September 2025
Surgical Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud - Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse.
Purpose Of Review: The increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques has transformed the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Among these, single-port techniques, including laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), robotic single-port laparoscopy (RSPL), and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES), have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional multiport laparoscopy. This review aims to evaluate recent evidence regarding the feasibility, perioperative outcomes, and oncologic safety of these techniques, with a focus on their role in endometrial cancer staging and management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Robot Surg
August 2025
School of Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, Kostava St. 77a, 0171, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Robotic multiport (RMP) and single-site (RSS) hysterectomies are minimally invasive surgical techniques increasingly employed in the treatment of endometrial cancer. This study assesses whether RSS provides distinct therapeutic and aesthetic benefits compared to RMP, such as fewer and smaller incisions, which enhance cosmetic satisfaction and expedite postoperative recovery. A retrospective analysis of comparative research on RSS and RMP in endometrial cancer was performed utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF