98%
921
2 minutes
20
Rationale: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are common in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Previous reports suggest that patients with CF are at increased risk for PICC-associated deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
Objectives: We assessed potential risk factors for symptomatic PICC-associated DVT with subsequent implementation of a quality improvement (QI) initiative to reduce PICC-associated DVT in patients with CF.
Methods: This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study with subsequent 21-month prospective observation following implementation of a QI intervention in adults (aged 18 yr or older) with CF. All patients with a PICC inserted from July 2006 to March 2013 at our CF Foundation-accredited center were included. Symptomatic DVT was diagnosed by Doppler ultrasound. PICC insertions were analyzed, and nine risk factors for DVT were analyzed to formulate a QI initiative to reduce risk of PICC-associated DVT. The QI program focused on staff education and included modification to PICC order entry with a 4 French (F) single-lumen (SL) catheter as standard for all patients with CF.
Measurements And Main Results: A total of 369 PICCs were analyzed in 117 unique patients for a total of 5,437 PICC-days of placement. Symptomatic DVT was diagnosed in 28 (7.6%) of the 369 PICCs analyzed. Using regression analysis, the strongest predictors for DVT occurrence were warfarin use (odds ratio [OR] = 9.2, P = 0.006) and history of PICC-associated DVT (OR = 2.97, P = 0.08). Insertion of a 4F SL PICC resulted in zero symptomatic DVT. Zero episodes of DVT associated with 4F PICC insertion prevented use of PICC size in regression analysis. However, univariate analysis revealed that insertion of a 4F SL PICC instead of either 5F double lumen or 6F triple lumen was associated with a reduction in PICC-associated DVT (P = 0.001). After the QI intervention, 4F SL catheter insertion substantially increased to 65.8% of all PICCs inserted, whereas 6F triple-lumen catheter insertion declined to 6.8% of PICCs inserted. The QI initiative resulted in an absolute risk reduction in DVT per PICC placed of 6.1% (P = 0.055).
Conclusions: To reduce risk of PICC-associated DVT in patients with CF, QI strategies should focus on insertion of smaller-diameter 4F PICCs and reduction in PICC use in high-risk patients when possible.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201404-175OC | DOI Listing |
Healthcare (Basel)
August 2025
Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are becoming an increasingly utilised alternative to traditional central venous access devices. Their uptake, particularly among oncology patients, is due to their growing ease of access, suitability for medium-term use and perceived safety profile. However, PICCs can be a source of severe and life-threatening complications such as central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), malpositioning, dislodgement, and occlusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
December 2024
Cardiology, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, GBR.
Introduction Surgical inpatients frequently require peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for parenteral feeding and administration of medication. PICCs may cause upper limb deep venous thrombosis (ULDVT), which impacts patient morbidity. We investigated the risk and prevention of PICC-ULDVT in hospitalised surgical inpatients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
May 2024
Physician at the Dialysis Center, MD, PhD. Hospital Sírio Libanês, Nephrologist and Professor at Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Respir Med Res
June 2024
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States. Electronic address:
Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are the most common route of intravenous (I.V.) access for treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations, but repeated PICC placement can result in upper extremity peripheral venous stenosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMo Med
August 2021
DOS UMC, MOI, Columbia, Missouri.
Background: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement is necessary for delivery of intravenous (IV) antibiotics to treat bone and soft tissue infections. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after PICC placement is a complication with unknown incidence in the orthopaedic literature. The major objectives of this study are Identifying the rate of upper extremity PICC-associated DVTs after orthopaedic procedures;Which orthopaedic subspecialties are most likely to encounter an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT?What surgeries or medical comorbidities are risk factors for upper extremity PICC-associated DVTs?Does type of DVT chemoprophylaxis decrease the risk of an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT?
Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMR) was performed to include all patients undergoing irrigation and debridement (I&D) for treatment of orthopaedic surgery-related infections over a 10-year period.