A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

What is the true incidence of anomalous bovine left common carotid artery configuration? | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Earlier studies have indicated that bovine left common carotid artery configuration occurs in 10.2-22% of patients and increases the complexity of navigating endovascular devices in the aortic arch. However, we anecdotally noted a higher incidence of bovine arch among angiosuite outpatients in Los Angeles, California. Thus, we retrospectively reviewed aortic arch angiograms performed in 93 unique outpatients to determine the true incidence of this anomalous configuration.

Methods: We were able to obtain complete angiographies from clinical data on 90 patients (mean age 50 years, SD 15.23 years, range 17-88 years) from May 2006 to January 2012. Angiograms were categorized as: normal arch; bovine arch with brachiocephalic trunk; bovine arch with common trunk; or indeterminate.

Results: The findings indicated an overall 35.16% bovine arch incidence, of which 78.13% is bovine arch with common trunk and 21.88% is bovine arch with brachiocephalic trunk. There was a higher prevalence in the women (40%, n = 60) than men (26.67%, n = 30). Caucasians had a lower incidence of bovine arch (27.78%, n = 47) compared with other ethnicities. The prevalence of bovine arch in different ethnicity and gender groups was assessed and the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The incidence of bovine left common carotid artery is higher than previously reported and varies by gender and race. Advanced knowledge of the high prevalence of this anomaly could reduce the risks and increase the efficiency of navigating catheters through the tortuous vessels during endovascular procedures. The clinical implications of this report warrant further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.06.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bovine arch
32
bovine left
12
left common
12
common carotid
12
carotid artery
12
incidence bovine
12
bovine
11
arch
11
true incidence
8
incidence anomalous
8

Similar Publications