A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Determinants of left- and right‑ventricular ejection fractions in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: There are inconsistent data regarding the factors affecting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) in patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the determinants of LVEF and RVEF in a large cohort of patients with repaired TOF.

Patients And Methods: The study comprised 122 patients with repaired TOF (median age, 24.2 years; interquartile range, 20.3-30.9; men, 60.6%) who had undergone cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Predictors of LVEF, RVEF, and RVEF corrected for shunting or regurgitations (cRVEF) were identified with the use of linear regression analyses.

Results: There was a weak correlation between RVEF and LVEF (r = 0.39, P <0.0001). A multiple regression analysis revealed the following independent predictors of LVEF: positive predictor - RVEF (P = 0.0002); negative predictors - pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF, P = 0.01) and male sex (P = 0.001). RVEF was predicted independently by positive predictors such as LVEF (P <0.0001) and LV end‑diastolic volume (LVEDV, P = 0.04) and negative predictors such as right ventricular mass (P <0.0001) and number of previous cardiothoracic surgery interventions (P = 0.005). In the model predicting cRVEF, only left ventricular mass was a positive predictor of cRVEF (P <0.0001), while right ventricular mass (P <0.0001), PRF (P <0.0001), male sex (P <0.0001), and RV late gadolinium enhancement score (P = 0.008) were negative predictors of cRVEF.

Conclusions: Because PRF was inversely and independently correlated with LVEF, and LVEDV showed a positive and independent correlation with RVEF, left ventricular disease (low LVEF and LVEDV due to left ventricular compression) may be used as a marker of the severity of right ventricular disease (pulmonary regurgitation severity and its consequences). Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of LVEF and LVEDV in supporting patient selection for pulmonary valve replacement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.20452/pamw.1929DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients repaired
12
tetralogy fallot
8
cardiac magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
imaging study
8
ventricular ejection
8
ejection fraction
8
lvef rvef
8
rvef
5

Similar Publications