Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Auditory potentials in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus were recorded in guinea pigs using two types of multi-channel surface microelectrodes with inter-electrode distance of 100 and 200 μm. Unequivocal waves of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs), which increased in amplitude with increasing stimulation current, were consistently observed. Electrophysiological mapping with these multichannel electrodes could clearly distinguish stimulation points showing positive EABRs from points showing undetectable EABRs, indicating that multi-channel surface microelectrodes have great potential in clinical use to determine the optimal location for the positioning of auditory brainstem implants, and may allow more precise discrimination of pitch. Further study to clarify the optimal inter-electrode distance for humans is necessary before application to physiological mapping in the human cochlear nucleus.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2077-5 | DOI Listing |