A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Single-dose time-resolved contrast enhanced hybrid MR angiography in diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: compared with digital subtraction angiography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively study the diagnostic performance of hybrid single-dose contrast-enhanced MRA of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.

Materials And Methods: Hybrid MRA, combining time resolved imaging of contrast kinetics and two-station bolus-chase sequences, of lower limb was performed in 31 PAD patients (21 men, 10 women; mean age, 72 years) with two separate gadobenate dimeglumine (8 mL) injections in each sequence. Two independent blinded readers analyzed the vascular stenosis (32 segments in each limb). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in all vascular segments and segments below popliteal artery were calculated. Interobserver agreements on MRA and intermodality agreements between MRA and DSA were calculated by using k statistics.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the hybrid MRA with regard to hemodynamically significant stenosis in all vascular segments were 92%, 97%, and 95% for reader 1, and 90%, 92%, and 92%, for reader 2, respectively. The interobsever agreements on MRA were good (k = 0.77-0.74) for all-grade stenosis, and excellent (k = 0.82-0.81) for hemadynamically significant stenosis. The intermodality agreements are good to excellent (k = 0.73-0.94).

Conclusion: Single-dose hybrid MRA is a safe and reliable noninvasive alternative to conventional DSA in the assessment of PAD patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22341DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hybrid mra
12
agreements mra
12
peripheral arterial
8
arterial disease
8
digital subtraction
8
subtraction angiography
8
pad patients
8
sensitivity specificity
8
specificity accuracy
8
vascular segments
8

Similar Publications