A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Anatomy of the vascular pedicle of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap as applied for head and neck reconstruction. | LitMetric

Anatomy of the vascular pedicle of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap as applied for head and neck reconstruction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, UMC Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Published: January 2011


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The vascular pedicle of the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap and its enhancement by inclusion of the internal mammary vessels up to the level of the first rib have not been systematically assessed anatomically, to date. This study assesses these features of this pedicle in light of the flap's application in head and neck reconstruction.

Material And Methods: The length of the dominant perforator and the enhanced vascular pedicle of the IMAP flap were measured in 27 fresh cadaveric hemi-thoraxes.

Results: In 18 out of 27 cadaveric cases (0.67) the second perforator was dominant. The mean length of the 27 dominant perforators was 47 mm (range: 30-66 mm). By enhancement up to the level of the first rib, the mean length of the vascular pedicle could be doubled to 92 mm when based on the second perforator (0.67). In the five cases (0.19), where the third perforator was dominant, the mean length of the enhanced pedicle was 104 mm, whereas it was 61 mm in the four cases (0.15) where the first perforator was dominant.

Conclusion: This is the first study that assessed the enhanced length of the vascular pedicle of the IMAP flap. Our results show that the mean length of the dominant second perforator may be doubled by such enhancement and that the arc of rotation to the head and neck region may, then, be doubled again. Hereby, even high-located defects in the head and neck region can be reached. This provides a better understanding of the feasibility of the pedicled IMAP flap in head and neck reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.03.054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vascular pedicle
20
imap flap
20
head neck
20
internal mammary
12
length dominant
12
second perforator
12
pedicle internal
8
mammary artery
8
perforator
8
artery perforator
8

Similar Publications