A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

[Diagnostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging and multislice spiral computed tomography for coronary artery disease]. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: Coronary angiography (CAG), MPI and MSCT were performed in 43 patients (36 with suspected, 7 with known CAD). MPI examinations were evaluated semiquantitatively by agreement of two experienced observers. SDS (summed difference score) > 1 was defined as reversible ischemia, and each myocardial segment was allocated to the territory of one of the coronary arteries. The MSCT results were defined as positive when stenoses (> or = 50%) were found in one main vessel or its main branch vessel. CAG results served as "gold standard". The diagnostic values of MPI and MSCT for CAD were compared respectively on patient basis and on vessel basis.

Results: On patient basis, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MPI for diagnosing CAD were 79.17%, 84.21% and 81.40% which were similar as those of MSCT: 83.33%, 89.47% and 86.05% (all P > 0.05). On vessel basis, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MPI were 53.19%, 89.02% and 75.97% which were also similar to those of MSCT: 70.21%, 95.12% and 86.05% (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The non-invasive MPI and MSCT provide satisfactory and similar diagnostic information on diagnosing CAD.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mpi msct
12
myocardial perfusion
8
perfusion imaging
8
multislice spiral
8
spiral computed
8
computed tomography
8
coronary artery
8
patient basis
8
basis sensitivity
8
sensitivity specificity
8

Similar Publications