A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effect of triangle ventricular pacing on haemodynamics and dyssynchrony in patients with advanced heart failure: a comparison study with conventional bi-ventricular pacing therapy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: This study examined the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by triangle ventricular pacing (Tri-V) on left ventricular (LV) function and dyssynchrony.

Methods And Results: Twenty-one patients with NYHA class III or IV heart failure were studied. For Tri-V, two right ventricular (RV) leads were connected to the CRT device via a Y-connector with one lead anchored at the RV apex and the other at the RV outflow tract. The LV lead was positioned in the posterolateral or lateral cardiac vein. CRT with standard bi-ventricular pacing (Bi-V) was performed with the RV apical and LV leads. LV function was assessed by the measurement of LV positive dp/dt (dP/dt(max)) and cardiac output (CO). LV dyssynchrony was assessed using the standard deviation of the time to peak myocardial velocity during the systolic phase in 12 LV segments (Ts-SD) derived from tissue Doppler images. In comparison to Bi-V, Tri-V increased dP/dt(max) (baseline, 746 +/- 165; Bi-V, 909 +/- 186; Tri-V, 959 +/- 195 mmHg/s, P = 0.04) and CO (baseline, 3.1 +/- 1.0; Bi-V, 3.4 +/- 1.1; Tri-V, 3.8 +/- 1.2 L/min, P < 0.001), decreased Ts-SD (baseline, 54.0 +/- 35.0; Bi-V, 33.6 +/- 15.3; Tri-V, 22.4 +/- 8.1 ms, P = 0.02).

Conclusion: The acute beneficial effects of Tri-V on LV function and dyssynchrony were greater than those of Bi-V.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm441DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

+/-
9
triangle ventricular
8
ventricular pacing
8
heart failure
8
bi-ventricular pacing
8
tri-v
7
bi-v
6
pacing
4
pacing haemodynamics
4
haemodynamics dyssynchrony
4

Similar Publications