Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Object: The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of bone ingrowth and bonding stiffness at the surface of hydroxyapatite ceramic (HAC) spacers with different porosities in an animal model and to discuss the ideal porous characteristics of these spacers for anterior spinal reconstruction.
Methods: Twenty-one adult sheep (age 1-2 years, mean weight 70 kg) were used in this experiment. Surgery consisted of anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L2-3 and L4-5, insertion of an HAC spacer (10 x 13 x 24 mm) with three different porosities (0, 3, and 15%), and single-rod anterior instrumentation. At 4 and 6 months postoperatively, the lumbar spines were harvested. Bonding conditions at the bone-HAC spacer interface were evaluated using neuroimages and biomechanically. A histological evaluation was also conducted to examine the state of bone ingrowth at the surface of the HAC spacer. Biomechanical testing showed that the bonding strength of HAC at 6 months postoperatively was 0.047 MPa in 0% porosity spacers, 0.39 MPa in 3%, and 0.49 MPa in 15% porosity spacers. The histological study showed that there was a soft-tissue layer at the surface of the HAC spacer with 0% porosity. Direct bonding was observed between bone and spacers with 3 or 15% porosity. Micro-computed tomography scans showed direct bonding between the bone and HAC with 3 or 15% porosity. No direct bonding was observed in HAC with 0% porosity.
Conclusions: Dense (0%) HAC anterior vertebral spacers did not achieve direct bonding to the bone in the sheep model. The HAC vertebral spacers with 3 or 15% porosity showed proof of direct bonding to the bone at 6 months postoperatively. The higher porosity HAC spacer showed better bonding stiffness to the bone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.5.431 | DOI Listing |