Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data.

Implant Dent

Ashman Department of Implant Dentistry, New York University, College of Dentistry, New York, New York 10010, USA.

Published: September 2004


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Screw loosening is considered to be a common problem with both screw-retained and cemented implant restorations. A wider abutment platform, as well as using a torque driver to tighten specifically designed screws may help prevent this loosening. However, there has been no clinical study evaluating either of these. To longitudinally compare the frequency of screw loosening in standard diameter, (3.75 and 4.0 mm) implant supported prostheses to that of wide diameter, (5.0 and 6.0 mm) implant supported prostheses that were hand tightened, and to evaluate whether using a torque driver would minimize or prevent this problem, if screw loosening occurred. A total of 213 dental implants in 106 patients were included in this prospective longitudinal study. Of the implants 68 were wide diameter and 145 were standard diameter implants. Wide diameter implants showed 5.8% screw loosening, while standard diameter implants showed 14.5% screw loosening after insertion with only hand torquing. When these loose screws were tightened with a torque driver, there was no more loosening of screws. Within the limitations of this study, the wide diameter implants tested showed less screw loosening than the standard diameter implants when hand torqued. Additionally, within the scope of our study, using a torque driver to tighten the screws with the recommended force prevented this loosening from reoccurring in all cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000140459.87333.f8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screw loosening
28
diameter implants
24
wide diameter
20
loosening standard
16
torque driver
16
standard diameter
16
diameter
9
loosening
9
implants
8
driver tighten
8

Similar Publications

Posterior lumbar screw fixation is the most common surgical method for lumbar disc herniation, but patients often face multiple complications postoperatively. The occurrence of screw track loosening can lead to fusion failure and even life-threatening screw track extrusion. However, there is currently a lack of animal models specifically targeting changes in the screw track following lumbar screw fixation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Acetabular reconstruction is often challenging in revision hip arthroplasty, especially in the face of moderate to severe acetabular bone deficiency. In some severe bone defects, double-metal tantalum cups can improve the contact area between bone and implants, increase the surface area for bone ingrowth, and better restore the anatomical position of the acetabulum. Furthermore, with a good press-fit, the auxiliary screw has a minimal effect on acetabular cup stability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) has become one of the most common spinal surgery procedures. Early symptomatic loosening of the pedicle screw could be a critical complication, leading to pseudarthrosis. However, revision strategies for pedicle screw loosening are still under debate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Management of forearm shaft fractures : Challenges and solution approaches].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)

September 2025

Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Breslauer Straße 201, 90471, Nürnberg, Deutschland.

Forearm shaft fractures are the most common fractures of the upper extremity in young adults. By definition, these fractures are diaphyseal fractures; however, due to the complex functional unity formed by the forearm shaft during motion both bone forearm fractures are treated as intra-articular fractures [1, 3]. This is why the gold standard of treatment in adults is osteosynthesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Screw loosening remains a frequent mechanical complication in implant-supported prostheses, primarily caused by the gradual loss of abutment-screw preload. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance of CAD-CAM custom and stock abutments by measuring removal torque values (RTV) at multiple time points and assessing surface morphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), following prolonged loading up to 2 × 10 cycles.

Methods: Forty-four implant-abutment assemblies with an internal conical-hex connection were divided into two groups: Stock abutments (SA) and custom abutments (CA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF