A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Development of acute inhalation reference exposure levels (RELs) to protect the public from predictable excursions of airborne toxicants. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Uniform guidelines have been developed for the derivation of 1-h acute inhalation reference exposure levels (RELs) applicable to the general public exposed routinely to hazardous substances released into the environment. Existing acute exposure guidance values developed by other organizations have been examined, and strengths and weaknesses in these existing guidelines have been identified. The results of that examination have led to the development of a reproducible and resource-intensive methodology to calculate acute inhalation RELs for 41 prioritized chemicals. Approaches to estimating levels protective against mild and severe acute effects are discussed in this report. The default methodology is the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL)/uncertainty factor (UF) approach using mainly reports in the peer-reviewed toxicological and medical literature. For two well-studied chemicals, ammonia and formaldehyde, the data allowed a benchmark dose (or concentration) methodology, as a departure from the default options, to be used. However, better human dose-response data from, for example, improved workplace monitoring correlated with symptoms, and more extensive epidemiological studies are needed before the departure from default approaches can be expanded to more substances.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.967DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute inhalation
12
inhalation reference
8
reference exposure
8
exposure levels
8
levels rels
8
departure default
8
development acute
4
rels protect
4
protect public
4
public predictable
4

Similar Publications