A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Subcutaneous administration of amifostine (ethyol) is equivalent to intravenous administration in a rat mucositis model. | LitMetric

Subcutaneous administration of amifostine (ethyol) is equivalent to intravenous administration in a rat mucositis model.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

Department of Molecular Biology/Biochemistry, MedImmune, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20872, USA.

Published: November 2003


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Amifostine (Ethyol) is currently approved for intravenous (IV) administration to prevent xerostomia in patients receiving radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Recently, subcutaneous (SC) administration has been explored as an alternative route. To determine whether SC administration was equivalent to IV administration, we used models to follow pharmacokinetics and oral mucosal protection in rats.

Methods: Amifostine was administered to rats at doses of 200, 100, or 50 mg/kg (1300, 650, or 325 mg/m(2)) IV or SC at various times before radiation at 15.3 Gy (protection studies) or harvest of blood and tissues for analysis by HPLC (pharmacokinetic studies).

Results: Amifostine administered IV or SC 1 h before radiation protected rats from mucositis, but the protective effect was more prolonged when amifostine was administered SC. Tissue levels of the active metabolite (WR-1065) were equivalent after SC administration. The correlation between tissue levels of WR-1065 and protection was strong, but that between blood levels of WR-1065 and protection was only weak.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate that, in a rat model, SC administration of amifostine was at least as effective as that by IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00660-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

amifostine administered
12
subcutaneous administration
8
administration amifostine
8
amifostine ethyol
8
intravenous administration
8
equivalent administration
8
tissue levels
8
levels wr-1065
8
wr-1065 protection
8
administration
7

Similar Publications