A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: We prospectively determined the accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) and needle biopsy of solid renal masses.

Materials And Methods: A total of 100 patients with a solid renal mass who were scheduled for operation were prospectively evaluated. CT was performed before radical or partial nephrectomy. Biopsy of the surgical specimens was done twice through the tumor using an 18 gauge biopsy gun. Specimens were sent for permanent section and review by 2 pathologists blinded to each other and to the whole tissue specimens. Images were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to each other and to the results of pathological analysis. Results of CT and permanent biopsy were compared with the results of whole tissue specimen analysis.

Results: Specimens were obtained from 59 radical and 41 partial nephrectomies. Malignant neoplasms were present in 85 patients (85%). Overall accuracy was 77% and 72%, the nondiagnostic rate was 20% and 21%, sensitivity was 81% and 83%, and specificity was 60% and 33%. For the 2 radiologists overall accuracy was 60% and 66%, the nondiagnostic rate was 31% and 23%, sensitivity was 70% and 77%, and specificity was 20% and 20%, respectively.

Conclusions: Overall permanent biopsy results were accurate in more than 72% of cases and CT was accurate in more than 60%. However, because the nondiagnostic rate for CT and needle biopsy was 20% and 31%, respectively, and specificity was low, we do not recommend routine preoperative CT and subsequent needle biopsy to guide treatment decision making. Rather, cases must be decided individually.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64038-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

needle biopsy
16
solid renal
12
nondiagnostic rate
12
computerized tomography
8
tomography needle
8
biopsy
8
radical partial
8
permanent biopsy
8
prospective analysis
4
analysis computerized
4

Similar Publications