Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
We compared instrumental analysis of enriched cord blood nucleated red blood cells (CB-NRBC) out of in vitro contamination preparations of dilutions of minute volumes of male cord blood into peripheral blood from nonpregnant women. This was done using the laser scanning cytometer (LSC) and the Metafer/RCDetect microscope scanning system, both allowing for relocation of positive cells defined on the basis of fluorescence parameters. Both instruments were efficient in performing scanning and relocation; a difference in the recovery of CB-NRBC was not significant and can be explained by the method of preparation used.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-022x(02)00098-2 | DOI Listing |