An empirical study of how the Dutch healthcare regulator first formulates the concept of trust and then puts it into practice.

Background: Responsive regulation assumes that the parties being regulated are trustworthy and motivated by social responsibility. This assumes that regulation based upon trust will improve the regulated organization more effectively than other regulation models. The purpose of our qualitative study was to unravel the most important elements of trust in the inspectee which can support the inspector's work and to develop a model and a framework of trust that can be used by the inspectors to legitimize their trust in the inspectee.

A cross-sectional study into medical students' perceptions of healthcare regulation and self-reported compliance: a study conducted in the City of Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, 2016.

Background: Although healthcare regulation is commonplace, there is limited evidence of its impact. Making sure that healthcare professionals comply with the regulatory requirements is a prerequisite to achieving effective regulation. Therefore, investigating factors that influence compliance may provide better insights into how regulators can be more effective.

Government supervision on quality of smoking-cessation counselling in midwifery practices: a qualitative exploration.

Background: The Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate supervises care providers in order to improve quality of care. Recently the inspectorate assessed and promoted the use of a guideline on smoking-cessation counselling in midwifery practices. The supervision programme consisted of an announcement of the enforcement deadline for the guideline and site visits.

[Effects of government supervision on quality of integrated diabetes care: a cluster randomized controlled trial].

Objectives: The quality of integrated diabetes care is important for reducing the burden of diabetes. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of a supervision program on the quality of integrated diabetes care in the Netherlands in the 2011-2012 period.

Methods: In this cluster RCT, the supervision program was assigned to randomly selected care groups providing care to diabetes patients.

The disciplined healthcare professional: a qualitative interview study on the impact of the disciplinary process and imposed measures in the Netherlands.

Objective: It is known that doctors who receive complaints may have feelings of anger, guilt, shame and depression, both in the short and in the long term. This might lead to functional impairment. Less is known about the impact of the disciplinary process and imposed measures.

Effects of Government Supervision on Quality of Integrated Diabetes Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: The quality of integrated diabetes care is important for reducing the burden of diabetes. Therefore, we have evaluated the effect of a supervision program on the quality of integrated diabetes care in the Netherlands in the 2011-2012 period.

Methods: In this cluster RCT, the supervision program was assigned to randomly selected care groups providing care to diabetes patients.

Provision and effect of quit-smoking counselling by primary care midwives.

Objective: we aimed to evaluate the provision of quit-smoking counselling by midwives in the Netherlands and its effect on smoking behaviour and birth weight.

Design: quasi-experimental study in which we collected information from pregnant women who smoke throughout their pregnancy by extracting data from electronic patient files.

Setting: primary care midwifery practices.

Guideline adherence and health outcomes in diabetes mellitus type 2 patients: a cross-sectional study.

Background: The complex disease of diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) requires a high standard of quality of care. Clinical practice guidelines define norms for diabetes care that ensure regular monitoring of T2DM patients, including annual diagnostic tests. This study aims to quantify guideline adherence in Dutch general practices providing care to T2DM patients and explores the association between guideline adherence and patients' health outcomes.

Does government supervision improve stop-smoking counseling in midwifery practices?

Introduction: Smoking-cessation counseling during pregnancy is important to prevent smoking-related harm in pregnant smokers and their children. Therefore we evaluated the effects of an Inspectorate's supervision programme on the provision of smoking-cessation counseling by midwifery practices in the Netherlands. The supervision programme consisted of 3 elements: A) A deadline was announced by which all practices should comply with professional norms on such counseling (2011); B) A set of randomly selected practices were assessed using a questionnaire and a personal feedback report (2010); C) Another set of randomly selected practices were assessed through a site visit and a personal feedback report (2012).

Unannounced, compared with announced inspections: a systematic review and exploratory study in nursing homes.

Politicians and regulators have high expectations of unannounced inspections. Unannounced inspections, unlike announced ones, would, they believe, lead to a clearer insight into the risks and a reduction of the regulatory burden. In order to verify these assumptions, a systematic review of the scientific literature and an exploratory study were conducted.

Health system reform in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

The desire to achieve the best outcomes in the provision of healthcare has driven health system reforms in many countries across the globe, including the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. As a young state (the United Arab Emirates was founded as an independent state in 1971) with a diverse (with 78% expatriates) and young population (40.23% of the national Emirati population is under 15 years of age), the government of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi has embarked on a journey to reform their healthcare system.

The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment.

Background: Health care regulatory agencies perform audits or inspections to judge the quality and safety of health care. This judgment is based on the assessment of a large set of health care indicators as accepted by the profession. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the influence of these indicators and whether a smaller number would be sufficient for a quality assessment or audit procedure.

Evaluating instruments for regulation of health care in the Netherlands.

Objectives: Reliable and valid judgments are necessary for regulatory authorities to merit confidence from care institutions and society and preserve authority. Moreover, limited reliability and validity of regulatory judgments increase the risk of limited improvement of the quality of health care. The goal of the study is to obtain insight in (dis) advantages of different regulatory instruments for regulation of health care.