Otol Neurotol
September 2025
Objectives: To compare electrical stimulation and speech perception in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients across treatment modalities and standard cochlear implant (CI) patients.
Study Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Tertiary academic center.
Background/objectives: Electrode impedance is crucial for optimizing cochlear implant (CI) stimulation and hearing outcomes. While typically stable, some patients experience unexplained impedance fluctuations. This study used electrode impedance subcomponent analysis to identify the subcomponents contributing to these impedance fluctuations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOtol Neurotol
February 2025
Objective: To analyze the use of electrical field imaging (EFI) in the detection of extracochlear electrodes in cochlear implants (CI).
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Tertiary academic medical center.
Background/objectives: Adult hearing-impaired patients qualifying for cochlear implants typically exhibit less than 60% sentence recognition under the best hearing aid conditions, either in quiet or noisy environments, with speech and noise presented through a single speaker. This study examines the influence of deep neural network-based (DNN-based) noise reduction on cochlear implant evaluation.
Methods: Speech perception was assessed using AzBio sentences in both quiet and noisy conditions (multi-talker babble) at 5 and 10 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) through one loudspeaker.
Objective: To review audiological experiences and early hearing outcomes from the early feasibility study of a fully implanted cochlear implant.
Study Design: Prospective cohort.
Setting: Tertiary academic medical center.
Objective: To describe an AI model to facilitate adult cochlear implant candidacy prediction based on basic demographical data and standard behavioral audiometry.
Methods: A machine-learning approach using retrospective demographic and audiometric data to predict candidacy CNC word scores and AzBio sentence in quiet scores was performed at a tertiary academic center. Data for the model were derived from adults completing cochlear implant candidacy testing between January 2011 and March 2023.
Objectives: A small number of cochlear implant (CI) users experience facial nerve stimulation (FNS), which can manifest as facial twitching. In some patients, this can be resolved by adjusting the electrical stimulation parameters. However, for others, facial stimulation can significantly impair CI outcomes or even prevent its use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To introduce and discuss implementation strategy for the Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model, a highly-coordinated cochlear implant (CI) care delivery model requiring a single on-site visit for preoperative workup, surgery, and postoperative programming.
Study Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, two-arm clinical trial.
Setting: Tertiary referral CI center.
Objective: To compare language and audiological outcomes among infants (<9 and <12 mo) and older children receiving cochlear implantation (CI).
Study Design: Retrospective chart review.
Setting: Tertiary academic referral center.
Objective: To remove barriers and improve access for patients seeking cochlear implantation.
Study Design: Prospective quality improvement study at a large tertiary academic care center.
Methods: A Kaizen quality improvement model was applied over the course of a year.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
March 2019
Objective: To evaluate outcomes in pediatric and adolescent patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing cochlear implantation.
Methods: A retrospective cohort design at two tertiary level academic cochlear implant centers. The subjects included nine children ages 1.
Objective: Currently, there is a paucity of literature evaluating hearing preservation outcomes in children following cochlear implantation. The objective of the current study is to report pediatric hearing preservation results following cochlear implantation with conventional full-length electrodes.
Study Design: Retrospective review (2000-2016).
Objectives/hypothesis: This study was designed to examine speech recognition and self-perceived health-related quality of life (HRQoL) received from cochlear implantation among a cohort of adults and children with a short duration of unilateral hearing loss greater than 6 months, but less than 2 years.
Study Design: Single-subject repeated measures prospective study.
Methods: This study assessed changes in speech recognition and self-perceived quality of life by prospectively analyzing data at the preoperative evaluation and at the 3-month and 6-month postactivation intervals.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that children who are non-traditional cochlear implant candidates, but are not making progress with appropriately fitted hearing aids and intervention, will demonstrate significant benefit from cochlear implantation as defined by improvement in (1) speech perception, (2) auditory skills development, and/or (3) progress on standardized measures of receptive and expressive language.
Study Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Two tertiary academic cochlear implant centers.
Ear Hear
February 2015
Objectives: The goal of this study was to create and validate a new set of sentence lists that could be used to evaluate the speech-perception abilities of listeners with hearing loss in cases where adult materials are inappropriate due to difficulty level or content. The authors aimed to generate a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty for the evaluation of performance over time and across conditions.
Design: The original Pediatric AzBio sentence corpus included 450 sentences recorded from one female talker.
J Am Acad Audiol
January 2012
Background: Best practices concerning the audiological management of the child diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) have not been definitively defined nor fully understood. One reason is that previous studies have demonstrated conflicting findings regarding the outcomes of cochlear implantation for children with ANSD. Thus, the question remains whether children with ANSD are able to achieve similar outcomes following cochlear implantation as those children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF