Introduction: The aims of this study are to 1) identify incidence rate of fracture occurrence among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients requiring open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) stratified by anatomic site and 2) assess the risk of perioperative wound complications among ESRD fracture patients requiring ORIF compared to non-ESRD patients.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, covering the period from January 2002 to December 2014, to examine patients over 18 years of age who underwent ORIF for extremity fractures in the United States. Two-sample Z-tests were employed to assess differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and anatomical fracture sites between ESRD and non-ESRD cohorts.
Study DesignNarrative review.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to answer the following questions: (1) What is the quality of informed consent in spine surgery, including both neurosurgery and orthopaedic spine surgery? (2) What limitations impede the ability of surgeons to engage in effective shared decision-making (SDM) and obtain adequate informed consent? (3) What strategies and solutions may improve the quality of informed consent and SDM? (4) What factors decrease the incidence of litigation in spine surgery?MethodsN/A.ResultsSDM is a collaborative process where patients are involved in their treatment choices through open communication about risks, alternatives, and postoperative expectations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF