Publications by authors named "Matthew David Rutter"

Background and study aims Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) represents a potential missed opportunity to diagnose or prevent colorectal cancer. This study aimed to create a standardised, nationwide audit system to determine why PCCRCs occur and to generate evidence to prevent them. Patients and methods PCCRCs occurring 6-48 months after a colonoscopy were identified from English national datasets and uploaded to a secure portal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer (PEUGIC) is an important key performance indicator for endoscopy quality. We examined variation in PEUGIC rates among endoscopy providers in England and explored associated factors.

Methods: The was a population-based, retrospective, case-control study, examining data from National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service and Hospital Episode Statistics databases for esophageal and gastric cancers diagnosed between 2009 and 2018 in England.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study looked at how much it would cost and how it would affect people's health if England improved their endoscopy (a type of medical test) services to be the best they can be.
  • They used a model to compare three types of endoscopy services: high, middle, and low performing, by simulating the experience of 40-year-olds until they are 90 years old.
  • The findings suggest that if all lower-performing services were improved, it could provide significant health benefits and save the NHS around £5 million each year.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite advances in understanding and reducing the risk of endoscopic procedures, there is little consideration of the safety of the wider endoscopy service. Patient safety incidents (PSIs) still occur. We sought to identify nonprocedural PSIs (nPSIs) and their causative factors from a human factors perspective and generate ideas for safety improvement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions improve patient care but may result in unintended consequences. To evaluate plausible harms and maximise benefits, theorisation using logic models can be useful. We aimed to explore the adverse effects of colonoscopy A&F using a feedback intervention theory (FIT) dark logic model before the National Endoscopy Database Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF