Objective: To evaluate wellness across interventional radiology residency programs within the US through their online presence and to highlight areas of success and further improvement.
Materials And Methods: A systematic review was conducted of the websites specific to Interventional Radiology and Graduate Medical Education (GME) for all ACGME-accredited IR residency programs listed in the 2023-2024 ERAS. Data collection was based on 39 predetermined wellness criteria across five categories: general program characteristics, financial, work, personal, and social, which were evaluated for their presence or absence on each website.
The use of non-specific language to describe board-certified dermatologists in academic settings obscures the public understanding of their qualifications. This study analyzes online patient reviews nationwide to assess gender differences in the terminology used to describe academic dermatologists. We conducted a cross-sectional study, examining reviews from 62 academic institutions across 39 states, analyzing the use of terms such as "provider," "practitioner," "clinician," "health care professional," "physician," "dermatologist," and "doctor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study examines the influence of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding on the publication choices of dermatologists, particularly in terms of journal tiers and pay-to-publish (P2P) versus free-to-publish (F2P) models. Utilizing k-means clustering for journal ranking based on SCImago Journal Rank, h-index, and Impact Factor, journals were categorized into three tiers and 54,530 dermatology publications from 2021 to 2023 were analyzed. Authors were classified as Top NIH Funded or Non-Top NIH Funded according to Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research rankings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study investigates the impact of Free-to-Publish (F2P) versus Pay-to-Publish (P2P) models in dermatology journals, focusing on their differences in terms of journal metrics, Article Processing Charges (APCs), and Open Access (OA) status. Utilizing k-means clustering, the research evaluates dermatology journals based on SCImago Journal Rankings (SJR), H-Index, and Impact Factor (IF), and examines the correlation between these metrics, APCs, and OA status (Full or Hybrid). Data from the SCImago Journal Rank and Journal Citation Report databases were used, and metrics from 106 journals were normalized and grouped into three tiers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Following the initial diagnosis of a marginal zone or follicle center lymphoma on skin biopsy, patients undergo staging to determine the extent of disease.
Objective: We sought to characterize the frequency that these patients were found to have a systemic nodal disease upon work-up as well as the impact of imaging on disease management.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with a working diagnosis of PCMZL or PCFCL treated at The Ohio State University from 1990 to 2022.
Arch Dermatol Res
April 2024
This study investigates the frequency of infections in autoimmune blistering disease (AIBD) patients treated with rituximab and evaluates the difference in infectious complications in patients on concomitant antibiotic and/or antiviral prophylaxis. The study retrospectively reviewed 43 AIBD patients who received rituximab over a five-year interval. The patients were categorized based on prophylaxis type (antibiotic, antiviral, or both) and concomitant immunosuppression status, which we defined as treatment with an immunosuppressive medication during the time frame they were given Rituximab.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Allergy Asthma Immunol
June 2024
Arch Dermatol Res
December 2023
In examining the influence of National Institute of Health (NIH) funding on gender distribution within dermatology leadership roles, a cross-sectional analysis of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited dermatology residencies was conducted. The gender of leadership faculty was verified using online resources, while institutions were categorized by their 2022 NIH dermatology funding status. Results revealed that male dermatologists predominantly occupied department chair roles, whereas female dermatologists were more frequently found in associate program director roles, regardless of funding status.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF