In praise of empathic AI.

In this article we investigate the societal implications of empathic artificial intelligence (AI), asking how its seemingly empathic expressions make people feel. We highlight AI's unique ability to simulate empathy without the same biases that afflict humans. While acknowledging serious pitfalls, we propose that AI expressions of empathy could improve human welfare.

Rationalization and self-sabotage.

In making the case that "rationalization is rational," Cushman downplays its signature liability: Rationalization exposes a person to the hazard of delusion and self-sabotage. In paradigm cases, rationalization undermines instrumental rationality by introducing inaccuracies into the representational map required for planning and effective agency.

Focal epilepsy caused by single cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is associated with regional and global resting state functional connectivity (FC) disruption.

Epilepsy, including the type with focal onset, is increasingly viewed as a disorder of the brain network. Here we employed the functional connectivity (FC) metrics estimated from the resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) to investigate the changes of brain network associated with focal epilepsy caused by single cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM). Eight CCM subjects and 21 age and gender matched controls were enrolled in the study.

A systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: Common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

Violence among youth is a pervasive public health problem. In order to make progress in reducing the burden of injury and mortality that result from youth violence, it is imperative to identify evidence-based programs and strategies that have a significant impact on violence. There have been many rigorous evaluations of youth violence prevention programs.

Responding to trust: surgeons' perspective on informed consent.

Background: Every day thousands of surgeons and patients negotiate their way through the complex process of decision-making about operative treatments. We conducted a series of qualitative studies, asking patients and surgeons to describe their experience and beliefs about informed decision-making and consent. This study focuses on surgeons' views.

The leap to trust: perspective of cholecystectomy patients on informed decision making and consent.

Background: Although experts in ethics and law prescribe autonomous decision making as an essential component of informed consent to operative treatment, patients with esophageal cancer told us in a previous study that they preferred to entrust decision making to their caregivers in the context of life-threatening illness. The purpose of this study was to describe the patients' perspective on the process of informed decision making and consent to operative treatment in the context of a less frightening illness and intervention.

Study Design: Face-to-face interviews with 33 patients recovering from elective cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis were conducted at Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada.