Introduction: Loss of reduction (LOR) is common after acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization. Tunnel position is a possible risk factor but has not been investigated after bidirectional stabilization. The aim was to analyze if clavicular, coracoidal and coracoclavicular (CC) radiographic tunnel position would be associated with LOR and clinical outcomes after bidirectional ACJ stabilization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFConcomitant glenohumeral pathologies may be present in patients with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. This study aims to record and compare the prevalence and treatment of CGP in cases with acute and chronic ACJ dislocations. This retrospective cross-sectional binational, bicentric study included patients that underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute (group A) and chronic (group C) ACJ dislocations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is among the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Several factors-including age, sex, and tear severity-have been identified as predictors for outcome after repair. The influence of the tear etiology on functional and structural outcome remains controversial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations are usually graded radiographically according to Rockwood, but differentiation between Rockwood types III and V may be ambiguous. The potentially clinically relevant horizontal instability is barely addressed in coronal radiographs. It was hypothesized that a new radiologic parameter (V angle) would complement ACJ diagnostics on anteroposterior radiographs by differentiating between cases of Rockwood III and V while also considering the aspect of dynamic horizontal translation (DHT).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To compare the 2-year clinical and radiological outcomes of an arthroscopic-assisted bidirectional stabilization procedure using a single low-profile (LPSB) or double-suture button (DSB) technique with additional percutaneous acromioclavicular (AC) cerclage fixation for patients with acute high-grade AC joint dislocation.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared male patients aged between 18 and 56 years with acute high-grade AC joint dislocation fixed with either a LPSB or DSB technique. Patients were examined at least 24 months after surgery.
Purpose: To radiographically describe, quantify, and compare clavicular tunnel widening (cTW) of 2 different types of stabilization devices and investigate a possible correlation between cTW and loss of reduction.
Methods: In a retrospective analysis of single-center registry data, we compared patients who were treated for an acute AC dislocation (Rockwood types III to V) with either the AC Dog Bone (DB) or low-profile AC (LP) repair systems. On 6-week and 6-month postoperative radiographs, we measured clavicle height and tunnel diameter.
Background: Classification and treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations according to the Rockwood classification is controversial. The "circles measurement" on Alexander views was proposed to enable a clear assessment of displacement in ACJ dislocations. However, the method and its ABC classification were introduced on a Sawbones model based on exemplary Rockwood scenarios without soft tissue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJBJS Essent Surg Tech
November 2021
Unlabelled: This video article demonstrates biological and synthetic acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular stabilization with use of a hamstring tendon graft and a low-profile TightRope implant (Arthrex). The low-profile TightRope reduces soft-tissue irritation due to knot stacks. The tendon graft is wrapped around the clavicle and the coracoid to avoid weakening of the osseous structures as a result of clavicular and coracoidal tunnel placement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Trauma Emerg Surg
December 2022
Purpose: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes increasingly relevant in an aging society. Functional outcome (FO) and the patient-reported outcome (PRO) after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) depends on numerous factors, including patient- and injury-specific factors. There is little evidence on how the FO and the PRO vary in different settings such as monotrauma or multiple injuries, even though the PHF is one of the more frequent fractures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF