Time-to-event analysis mitigates the impact of symptomatic therapy on therapeutic benefit in Parkinson's disease trials.

The use of symptomatic medications represents a challenge for clinical trials of novel medicines designed to slow Parkinson's disease progression. A time-to-event (TTE) approach using a defined motor progression milestone may mitigate the confounding effect of symptomatic therapy on the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). This analysis uses prasinezumab- and placebo-treated groups from the PASADENA study to evaluate the impact of symptomatic medications on treatment effects by comparing a TTE approach to a change-from-baseline approach with and without censoring the population upon starting symptomatic therapy.

Estimation of and clinical consensus on the meaningful motor progression threshold on MDS-UPDRS Part III.

BackgroundTo understand changes in the underlying progression of early Parkinson's disease, it is important to derive estimates of the threshold for meaningful motor progression on the MDS-UPDRS Part III in OFF medication state.ObjectiveTo estimate this threshold using two approaches: anchor-based analyses, and clinical consensus via a modified Delphi panel.MethodsFor the anchor-based analyses, data from a Phase II clinical trial were used.

A Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous prasinezumab in early-stage Parkinson's disease (PADOVA): Rationale, design, and baseline data.

Introduction: Prasinezumab was shown to potentially delay motor progression in individuals with early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) who were either treatment-naïve or on monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor (MAO-Bi) therapy in the PASADENA study. We report the rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics of the PADOVA study, designed to evaluate prasinezumab in an early-stage PD population receiving standard-of-care (SOC) symptomatic medications.

Methods: PADOVA (NCT04777331) is a Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, in which individuals with early-stage PD on SOC stable symptomatic monotherapy (levodopa or MAO-Bi) receive intravenous prasinezumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks.

Prasinezumab slows motor progression in rapidly progressing early-stage Parkinson's disease.

Prasinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds aggregated α-synuclein, is being investigated as a potential disease-modifying therapy in early-stage Parkinson's disease. Although in the PASADENA phase 2 study, the primary endpoint (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) sum of Parts I + II + III) was not met, prasinezumab-treated individuals exhibited slower progression of motor signs than placebo-treated participants (MDS-UPDRS Part III). We report here an exploratory analysis assessing whether prasinezumab showed greater benefits on motor signs progression in prespecified subgroups with faster motor progression.

Approaches to the Assessment of Clinical Benefit of Treatments for Conditions That Have Heterogeneous Symptoms and Impacts: Potential Applications in Rare Disease.

Objectives: Evaluating the clinical benefit of interventions for conditions with heterogeneous symptom and impact presentations is challenging. The same condition can present differently across and within individuals over time. This occurs frequently in rare diseases.

Self-Report versus Clinician Examination in Early Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Evaluating the discrepancies between patient-reported measures and clinician examination has implications for formulating individual treatment regimens.

Objective: This study investigated the association between health outcomes and level of self-reported motor-related function impairment relative to clinician-examined motor signs.

Methods: Recently diagnosed PD patients were evaluated using the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI, N = 420) and the PASADENA phase II clinical trial (N = 316).

Development of the SMA independence scale-upper limb module (SMAIS-ULM): A novel scale for individuals with Type 2 and non-ambulant Type 3 SMA.

Background: The amount of assistance required to perform daily activities for individuals with Type 2 and non-ambulant Type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is often cited as meaningful for quality of life, and important to routinely assess.

Methods: The SMA Independence Scale (SMAIS), a patient-reported outcome measure for individuals with SMA aged ≥12 years, and an observer-reported outcome measure for caregivers of individuals aged ≥2 years, was developed and evaluated in two phases. In Phase 1, 30 draft items were developed following review of the literature.

Assessment of the validity and reliability of the 32-item Motor Function Measure in individuals with Type 2 or non-ambulant Type 3 spinal muscular atrophy.

The 32-item Motor Function Measure (MFM32) is an assessment of motor function, and its measurement properties were established in a broad neuromuscular disease population. This study sought to investigate the reliability, validity, and ability to detect change of MFM32 in individuals with Type 2 and non-ambulant Type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Data were used from the Phase 2 study assessing the efficacy and safety of olesoxime.

Validity and Reliability of the 32-Item Motor Function Measure in 2- to 5-Year-Olds with Neuromuscular Disorders and 2- to 25-Year-Olds with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Introduction: To investigate the validity and reliability of the 32-item Motor Function Measure (MFM32) in individuals with neuromuscular disorders (NMD), including spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), aged 2-5 years, and in non-ambulant individuals with Types 2 or 3 SMA, aged 2-25 years.

Methods: Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha [α]), convergent validity (Spearman rank-order correlations), and known-groups validity (analysis of covariance comparing groups defined by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity [CGI-S] scale and Vignos grade) were calculated. The analysis was performed on a dataset provided by Hospices Civils De Lyon, extracted from the multinational MFM32 database.

Measurement properties of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) in patients with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease.

Background: Anemia is a common and debilitating manifestation of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data from two clinical trials in patients with anemia of CKD were used to assess the measurement properties of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 version 2 (hereafter SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An). The Vitality and Physical functioning domains of the SF-36 and the FACT-An Total, Fatigue and Anemia subscales were identified as domains relevant to CKD-associated anemia.

Evaluating the Measurement Properties of the Self-Assessment of Treatment Version II, Follow-Up Version, in Patients with Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

The Self-Assessment of Treatment version II (SAT II) measures treatment-related improvements in pain and impacts and impressions of treatment in neuropathic pain patients. The measure has baseline and follow-up versions. This study assesses the measurement properties of the SAT II.

Deriving health utility values from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of siltuximab in subjects with multicentric Castleman's disease.

Purpose: To estimate health utility values, explore predictors of utility values, and estimate the quality-adjusted life years (Q.A.L.

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument.

Background: Nighttime symptoms can negatively impact the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI) was designed to measure the occurrence and severity of nighttime symptoms in patients with COPD, the impact of symptoms on nighttime awakenings, and rescue medication use. The objective of this study was to explore item reduction, inform scoring recommendations, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the NiSCI.