dArc1 controls sugar reward valuation in Drosophila melanogaster.

The Arc genes-which include Drosophila Arc1 and Arc2 (dArc)-evolved from Ty3 retrotransposons and encode proteins that form virus-like capsids. These capsids enable a novel form of intercellular communication by transferring RNAs between cells. However, the specific neuronal circuits and brain processes controlled by Arc signaling remain unidentified.

Connectomic analysis of taste circuits in Drosophila.

Our sense of taste is critical for regulating food consumption. The fruit fly Drosophila represents a highly tractable model to investigate mechanisms of taste processing, but taste circuits beyond sensory neurons are largely unidentified. Here, we use a whole-brain connectome to investigate the organization of Drosophila taste circuits.

controls sugar reward valuation in .

The genes - which include and ( ) - evolved from Ty3 retrotransposons and encode proteins that form virus-like capsids. These capsids enable a novel form of intercellular communication by transferring RNAs between cells. However, the specific neuronal circuits and brain processes Arc intercellular signaling regulates remain unknown.

Connectomic analysis of taste circuits in .

Our sense of taste is critical for regulating food consumption. The fruit fly represents a highly tractable model to investigate mechanisms of taste processing, but taste circuits beyond sensory neurons are largely unidentified. Here, we use a whole-brain connectome to investigate the organization of taste circuits.

Overlap and divergence of neural circuits mediating distinct behavioral responses to sugar.

How do neural circuits coordinate multiple behavioral responses to a single sensory cue? Here, we investigate how sweet taste drives appetitive behaviors in Drosophila, including feeding, locomotor suppression, spatial preference, and associative learning. We find that neural circuits mediating different innate responses to sugar are partially overlapping and diverge at the second and third layers. Connectomic analyses reveal distinct subcircuits that mediate different behaviors.

Selective integration of diverse taste inputs within a single taste modality.

A fundamental question in sensory processing is how different channels of sensory input are processed to regulate behavior. Different input channels may converge onto common downstream pathways to drive the same behaviors, or they may activate separate pathways to regulate distinct behaviors. We investigated this question in the bitter taste system, which contains diverse bitter-sensing cells residing in different taste organs.

Sensory biology: Olfactory crosstalk reshapes odor coding.

New research uncovers a novel form of crosstalk between olfactory pathways in the antennal lobe, the first olfactory center of the fly brain. This crosstalk reshapes odor coding and may explain how carbon dioxide can elicit either attraction or aversion.

Taste cues elicit prolonged modulation of feeding behavior in .

Taste cues regulate immediate feeding behavior, but their ability to modulate future behavior has been less well studied. Pairing one taste with another can modulate subsequent feeding responses through associative learning, but this requires simultaneous exposure to both stimuli. We investigated whether exposure to one taste modulates future responses to other tastes even when they do not overlap in time.

Neural Circuits Underlying Behavioral Flexibility: Insights From .

Behavioral flexibility is critical to survival. Animals must adapt their behavioral responses based on changes in the environmental context, internal state, or experience. Studies in have provided insight into the neural circuit mechanisms underlying behavioral flexibility.

Individual bitter-sensing neurons in Drosophila exhibit both ON and OFF responses that influence synaptic plasticity.

The brain generates internal representations that translate sensory stimuli into appropriate behavior. In the taste system, different tastes activate distinct populations of sensory neurons. We investigated the temporal properties of taste responses in Drosophila and discovered that different types of taste sensory neurons show striking differences in their response dynamics.

Acetic acid activates distinct taste pathways in to elicit opposing, state-dependent feeding responses.

Taste circuits are genetically determined to elicit an innate appetitive or aversive response, ensuring that animals consume nutritious foods and avoid the ingestion of toxins. We have examined the response of to acetic acid, a tastant that can be a metabolic resource but can also be toxic to the fly. Our data reveal that flies accommodate these conflicting attributes of acetic acid by virtue of a hunger-dependent switch in their behavioral response to this stimulus.

The novel gene tank, a tumor suppressor homolog, regulates ethanol sensitivity in Drosophila.

In both mammalian and insect models of ethanol intoxication, high doses of ethanol induce motor impairment and eventually sedation. Sensitivity to the sedative effects of ethanol is inversely correlated with risk for alcoholism. However, the genes regulating ethanol sensitivity are largely unknown.

The evolution of Drosophila melanogaster as a model for alcohol research.

Animal models have been widely used to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying the acute and long-term effects of alcohol exposure. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster encounters ethanol in its natural habitat and possesses many adaptations that allow it to survive and thrive in ethanol-rich environments. Several assays to study ethanol-related behaviors in flies, ranging from acute intoxication to self-administration and reward, have been developed in the past 20 years.

Acute ethanol responses in Drosophila are sexually dimorphic.

In mammalian and insect models of ethanol intoxication, low doses of ethanol stimulate locomotor activity whereas high doses induce sedation. Sex differences in acute ethanol responses, which occur in humans, have not been characterized in Drosophila. In this study, we find that male flies show increased ethanol hyperactivity and greater resistance to ethanol sedation compared with females.

Drosophila melanogaster as a model to study drug addiction.

Animal studies have been instrumental in providing knowledge about the molecular and neural mechanisms underlying drug addiction. Recently, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has become a valuable system to model not only the acute stimulating and sedating effects of drugs but also their more complex rewarding properties. In this review, we describe the advantages of using the fly to study drug-related behavior, provide a brief overview of the behavioral assays used, and review the molecular mechanisms and neural circuits underlying drug-induced behavior in flies.

The genetic relationships between ethanol preference, acute ethanol sensitivity, and ethanol tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

The relationship between alcohol consumption, sensitivity, and tolerance is an important question that has been addressed in humans and rodent models. Studies have shown that alcohol consumption and risk of abuse may correlate with (1) increased sensitivity to the stimulant effects of alcohol, (2) decreased sensitivity to the depressant effects of alcohol, and (3) increased alcohol tolerance. However, many conflicting results have been observed.

Addiction-like behavior in Drosophila.

Alcohol abuse is a pervasive problem known to be influenced by genetic factors, yet our understanding of the mechanisms underlying alcohol addiction is far from complete. Drosophila melanogaster has been established as a model for studying the molecular mechanisms that mediate the acute and chronic effects of alcohol. However, the Drosophila model has not yet been extended to include more complex alcohol-related behaviors such as self-administration.

Preferential ethanol consumption in Drosophila models features of addiction.

Alcohol addiction is a common affliction with a strong genetic component [1]. Although mammalian studies have provided significant insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying ethanol consumption [2], other organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster are better suited for unbiased, forward genetic approaches to identify novel genes. Behavioral responses to ethanol, such as hyperactivity, sedation, and tolerance, are conserved between flies and mammals [3, 4], as are the underlying molecular pathways [5-9].

Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila.

Selection of appropriate oviposition sites is essential for progeny survival and fitness in generalist insect species, such as Drosophila melanogaster, yet little is known about the mechanisms regulating how environmental conditions and innate adult preferences are evaluated and balanced to yield the final substrate choice for egg-deposition. Female D. melanogaster are attracted to food containing acetic acid (AA) as an oviposition substrate.