A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Visual Feedback Gain Affects Cognitive Motor Function During Constant Grip Strength Control: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Visual feedback gain critically affects feedback quality and fine motor control, yet its neural basis related to cognitive motor control remains unclear. Nineteen healthy right-handed participants performed constant grip tracking at 20% of maximum voluntary contraction under low, medium, and high visual feedback gains. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy recorded hemodynamic responses from six regions of interest (ROIs): left/right prefrontal cortex (LPFC/RPFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), left supplementary motor and premotor area (LSMA&PMA), left primary motor cortex (LM1), and left primary somatosensory cortex (LS1). Simultaneous grip force was collected. Under the medium gain level, the mean absolute error (MAE) was significantly lower than under both low ( ${P}\lt 0.001$ ) and high ( ${P}={0}.{036}$ ) gain levels. Compared to the low gain level, the medium gain level showed higher HbO peaks in the RPFC ( ${P}={0}.{022}$ ), DLPFC ( ${P}={0}.{011}$ ), LSMA&PMA ( ${P}={0}.{041}$ ) and LS1 ( ${P}={0}.{032}$ ), greater phase-locking value between ROIs within the LPFC-RPFC ( ${P}\lt 0.001$ ), RPFC-DLPFC ( ${P}={0}.{047}$ ) and DLPFC-LS1 ( ${P}={0}.{030}$ ), along with enhanced global coherence and higher clustering coefficients. Moreover, under the medium gain level, motor performance was significantly positively correlated with cortical activation across all six ROIs ( ${P}\lt 0.05$ ). These findings suggest medium visual feedback gain optimally balances spatial information, enabling efficient neural resource allocation and enhanced motor performance. This study offers novel insights into the neural mechanisms of visually guided precision grip.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3605288DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual feedback
16
gain level
16
feedback gain
12
medium gain
12
gain
8
cognitive motor
8
constant grip
8
functional near-infrared
8
near-infrared spectroscopy
8
motor control
8

Similar Publications